What sort of country do we want to become? Ian McDonald skrifar 11. maí 2023 07:31 The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union. Viltu birta grein á Vísi? Sendu okkur póst. Senda grein Kjaramál Kjaraviðræður 2022-23 Ian McDonald Mest lesið Er þetta í þínu boði, kæri forsætisráðherra? Jónína Brynjólfsdóttir Skoðun Skattfé nýtt í áróður Tómar Þór Þórðarson Skoðun Barnaskattur Kristrúnar Frostadóttur Vilhjálmur Árnason Skoðun Réttmæti virðingar á skólaskyldu? Edda Sigrún Svavarsdóttir Skoðun Sirkus Daða Smart Jens Garðar Helgason Skoðun Bændur fá ekki orðið Jóhanna María Sigmundsdóttir Skoðun Að vera treggáfaður: Er píkan greindari en pungurinn? Ágústa Ágústsdóttir Skoðun Ofbeldi í nánum samböndum Sigríður Ingibjörg Ingadóttir,Steinunn Bragadóttir Skoðun Hin einfalda mynd um lífið sem haldið var að mannkyni, var aldrei sönn Matthildur Björnsdóttir Skoðun Kjölfestan í mannlífinu Gunnlaugur Stefánsson Skoðun Skoðun Skoðun Skelin Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson skrifar Skoðun Ójöfn atkvæði eða heimastjórn! Sigurður Hjartarson skrifar Skoðun Sirkus Daða Smart Jens Garðar Helgason skrifar Skoðun Bændur fá ekki orðið Jóhanna María Sigmundsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Íslenska sem brú að betra samfélagi Vanessa Monika Isenmann skrifar Skoðun Ofbeldi í nánum samböndum Sigríður Ingibjörg Ingadóttir,Steinunn Bragadóttir skrifar Skoðun Skattfé nýtt í áróður Tómar Þór Þórðarson skrifar Skoðun Hin einfalda mynd um lífið sem haldið var að mannkyni, var aldrei sönn Matthildur Björnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Réttmæti virðingar á skólaskyldu? Edda Sigrún Svavarsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Er þetta í þínu boði, kæri forsætisráðherra? Jónína Brynjólfsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Stjórnvöld sinna ekki málefnum barna af fagmennsku Lúðvík Júlíusson skrifar Skoðun Kjölfestan í mannlífinu Gunnlaugur Stefánsson skrifar Skoðun Barnaskattur Kristrúnar Frostadóttur Vilhjálmur Árnason skrifar Skoðun Siðlaust sinnuleysi í Mjódd Helgi Áss Grétarsson skrifar Skoðun Heimavinnu lokið – aftur atvinnuuppbygging á Bakka Hjálmar Bogi Hafliðason skrifar Skoðun Kemur maður í manns stað? Steinunn Þórðardóttir skrifar Skoðun R-BUGL: Ábyrgðin er okkar allra Guðmundur Ingi Þóroddsson skrifar Skoðun Gleymdu ekki þínum minnsta bróður. Sigurður Fossdal skrifar Skoðun Íslensk tunga þarf meiri stuðning Ármann Jakobsson,Eva María Jónsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvar eru sérkennararnir í nýjum lögum um inngildandi menntun? Sædís Ósk Harðardóttir skrifar Skoðun Hjálpum spilafíklum Þorleifur Hallbjörn Ingólfsson skrifar Skoðun Hvað er að vera vók? Eva Hauksdóttir skrifar Skoðun Þjóðin sem ákvað að leggja sjálfa sig niður Margrét Tryggvadóttir,Sigríður Hagalín Björnsdóttir skrifar Skoðun Hvað kennir hugrekki okkur? Sigurður Árni Reynisson skrifar Skoðun Þeir vita sem nota Jón Pétur Zimsen skrifar Skoðun Hjólhýsabyggð á heima í borginni Einar Sveinbjörn Guðmundsson skrifar Skoðun Mannréttindi eða plakat á vegg? Friðþjófur Helgi Karlsson skrifar Skoðun „Friðartillögur“ Bandaríkjamanna eru svik við Úkraínu Arnór Sigurjónsson skrifar Skoðun Styrkur Íslands liggur í grænni orku Sverrir Falur Björnsson skrifar Skoðun Eftir hverju er verið að bíða? Hlöðver Skúli Hákonarson skrifar Sjá meira
The Icelandic government has undergone a shift in priorities over the past few years. Not too long ago, the welfare and wellbeing of its people were seen as an utmost priority, and everything else existed in order to facilitate that wellbeing. Today, tourists and specifically the money they bring, are valued far more than the lives and livelihood of the people who call Iceland home, and furthermore those people now exist mostly to facilitate the wellbeing and comfort of those wealthy tourists. The government likes to claim that the vast amounts of money brought in by tourism will naturally trickle down and wash over the population, bringing prosperity to all it touches. This might be a reality in a fair and just system, or one where the biggest industries are not owned by a tiny handful of people and their families. In that reality, the riches only get concentrated in a few hands and then squirreled away offshore to avoid scrutiny from the tax office. The end result of this kind of a system is for Iceland to end up as a place just like Monaco. One which is hugely expensive, and where the vast majority of jobs are in the service industry, whose workers cannot even afford to live in the cities which they work, serving the rich who travel there. In these kind of places, the government does not care about high prices for food, housing or transportation because they know that the visiting tourists are happy to pay a premium for the privilege of visiting. Therefore there is no incentive to lower costs. Lower prices mean lower profits. Conversely, the workers are forced to pay these extortionate prices because they have no other choice. They are trapped in a system where they spend their entire paycheck just to survive. If the Icelandic government wants to live up to its well-polished, massaged image of equality and a high standard of living, which it likes to portray to the rest of the world, they must state clearly that the people who live here are prioritized more highly than tourist dollars, and to act accordingly. We live in one of the wealthiest countries in the world. The GDP of Iceland in 2022 was almost 7 percent, which equates to around 25 billion dollars. There is no reason for people to not be able to afford to survive. No excuses. The author is a member of Efling Union.
Hin einfalda mynd um lífið sem haldið var að mannkyni, var aldrei sönn Matthildur Björnsdóttir Skoðun
Skoðun Hin einfalda mynd um lífið sem haldið var að mannkyni, var aldrei sönn Matthildur Björnsdóttir skrifar
Skoðun Þjóðin sem ákvað að leggja sjálfa sig niður Margrét Tryggvadóttir,Sigríður Hagalín Björnsdóttir skrifar
Hin einfalda mynd um lífið sem haldið var að mannkyni, var aldrei sönn Matthildur Björnsdóttir Skoðun